When I retired, I wanted to finish writing a book I had
started many years previously. It was a project born out of a desire to do
something about the decline in the perceived value of the medical consultation
among many resident doctors. I felt this decline significantly compromised
patient care and was likely to be even more of a concern with the increasing
availability of AI. However, I was always uncertain whether my concerns and
views resonated with the wider medical community and whether my ideas would be
accepted. While the book was in its formative stages, I discussed this with a
few colleagues who were encouraging and so I wrote the book. I was delighted
when the book was published last year because it meant that my ideas were now
in the public domain.
I then wondered how I could reach out to the target
audience; how I could share my ideas: Medical Journals no longer publish book
reviews, book signings were clearly inappropriate, and it is said few doctors
read textbooks. I therefore decided to write some articles to share my opinions
and ideas, and to generate interest in the topic. I was
really pleased when the first of these was published in The American
Journal of Medicine: "The Clinical Paradox":
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(24)00399-1/fulltext
This was particularly important as it is a prestigious
medical journal that, by publishing the article, validates the importance of
the topic.
Post Views : 4